Ron Paul's Speech to Congress
HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
BEFORE THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
November 10, 2005
Free Speech and Dietary Supplements
Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Health Freedom Protection Act. This
bill restores the First Amendment rights of consumers to receive
truthful information regarding the benefits of foods and dietary
supplements by codifying the First Amendment standards used by federal
courts to strike down the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) efforts to
censor truthful health claims. The Health Freedom Protection Act also
stops the Federal Trade Commissions (FTC) from censoring truthful health
care claims.
The American people have made it clear they do not want the federal
government to interfere with their access to dietary supplements, yet
the FDA and the FTC continue to engage in heavy-handed attempts to
restrict such access. The FDA continues to frustrate consumers' efforts
to learn how they can improve their health even after Congress,
responding to a record number of constituents' comments, passed the
Dietary Supplement and Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA). FDA
bureaucrats are so determined to frustrate consumer access to truthful
information that they are even evading their duty to comply with four
federal court decisions vindicating consumers' First Amendment rights to
discover the health benefits of foods and dietary supplements.
FDA bureaucrats have even refused to abide by the DSHEA section allowing
the public to have access to scientific articles and publications
regarding the role of nutrients in protecting against diseases by
claiming that every article concerning this topic is evidence of intent
to sell a drug.
Because of the FDA's censorship of truthful health claims, millions of
Americans may suffer with diseases and other health care problems they
may have avoided by using dietary supplements. For example, the FDA
prohibited consumers from learning how folic acid reduces the risk of
neural tube defects for four years after the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention recommended every woman of childbearing age take folic
acid supplements to reduce neural tube defects. This FDA action
contributed to an estimated 10,000 cases of preventable neutral tube
defects!
The FDA also continues to prohibit consumers from learning about the
scientific evidence that glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate are
effective in the treatment of osteoarthritis; that omega-3 fatty acids
may reduce the risk of sudden death heart attack; and that calcium may
reduce the risk of bone fractures.
The Health Freedom Protection Act will force the FDA to at last comply
with the commands of Congress, the First Amendment, and the American
people by codifying the First Amendment standards adopted by the federal
courts. Specifically, the Health Freedom Protection Act stops the FDA
from censoring truthful claims about the curative, mitigative, or
preventative effects of dietary supplements, and adopts the federal
court's suggested use of disclaimers as an alternative to censorship.
The Health Freedom Protection Act also stops the FDA from prohibiting
the distribution of scientific articles and publications regarding the
role of nutrients in protecting against disease.
This legislation also addresses the FTC's violations of the First
Amendment. Under traditional First Amendment jurisprudence, the federal
government bears the burden of proving an advertising statement false
before censoring that statement. However, the FTC has reversed the
standard in the case of dietary supplements by requiring supplement
manufactures to satisfy an unobtainable standard of proof that their
statement is true. The FTC's standards are blocking innovation in the
marketplace.
The Health Freedom Protection Act requires the government bear the
burden of proving that speech could be censored. This is how it should
be in a free, dynamic society. The bill also requires that the FTC warn
parties that their advertising is false and give them a chance to
correct their mistakes.
Mr. Speaker, if we are serious about putting people in charge of their
health care, then shouldn't we stop federal bureaucrats from preventing
Americans from learning about simple ways to improve their health. I
therefore call on my colleagues to stand up for good health care and the
First Amendment by cosponsoring the Health Freedom Protection Act.
also see:
Why is the FDA Picking on Cherry Growers?
Do Lemons Cure Scurvy?
The French Connection
FDA Tyranny
Letter to Representative Bart Stupak
Letter to U.S. Representatives
The FDA and You
The Health Freedom Protection Act
Jonathan Emord's Speech
Mangosteen versus Tart Cherry Juice
Response to Dr. Stephen Barrett, Quackwatch
|